October 11, 2020
review in reading lumbar spine radiographs

A Review on Reading Lumbar X-rays

Low back pain is an common complaint in both athletes and the general public. Some will present after an acute fall or injury, while others will complain of chronic symptoms that may be lingering. Different protocols may exist in sports medicine and orthopedic practices depending on the background and whether or not trauma was involved.

The region included will depend on the film size and centering used by the radiographer.  Some providers prefer longer and narrow films that include more of the lumbar spine, while others may want smaller films.  Three views (AP, lateral, focused lateral lumbosacral) will cover most causes of lumbar pain.  Focused lateral views allow optimal viewing of the L5-S1 disc space.  For the AP view, the provider should be able to see the L1-5, T12 vertebral body, T11/T12 space and the sacrum.  For the lateral view, the vertebral bodies, transverse processes, facet joints and pedicles should be clearly seen. Oblique views may be added to exclude spondylolysis.  Flexion and extension views may be added that may exacerbate spondylolisthesis and help determine instability.  The value of plain films of the lumbosacral spine are questioned in the assessment of sciatica and more advanced imaging may be needed.

For each series, a general pattern that is reproducible should be followed.  The vertebrae should be identified and counted slowly and bodies should be looked at from top to bottom.  It should be checked that the alignment is in order and may be different depending on the view.  To do this, one should draw an imaginary line joining the anterior aspects of the vertebral bodies (anterior body line), the posterior aspects of the bodies (posterior body line), and the line joining the short interfaces where the spinous processes join the laminae posteriorly (spinolaminar line) [1].  The lumbar spine should curve in a light lordotic configuration.

 
xray of lumbar spine labeled

Figure 1. Lateral lumbar radiographs (labeled)

xray of lumbar spine labeled

Figure 2. AP lumbar radiographs (labeled)

The AP View

This is the best view to determine if there is curvature in the spine and may also help identify any metastasis. Evaluate for proper spinous process and vertebral body alignment (Fig 3). When viewing the curvature, be aware that a curvature in the thoracic spine may exist when viewing the lumbar spine and this may be a compensatory curve. Most adolescent scoliosis is levoscoliotic or convex left. Degenerative curvature can be in any direction. The convexity opens the neural foramina and the concavity narrows the open foramina [2]. The concave part of the scoliosis can close the neural foramen and pinch the nerve. While looking at the AP, be sure to visualize the pedicles at every level (Fig 4). A “winking owl” sign may herald a destructive process like metastatic cancer in the pedicle (Fig 5) [3].
ap view spine alignment xray normal labeled and unlabeled

Image 3. AP Spine Alignment

dextroscoliosis levoscoliosis illustration back pain

Image 4. Dextroscoliosis vs levoscoliosis

winking owl sign back pain

Image 5. ‘Winking Owl’ sign

The Cobb angle is the most widely used measurement to quantify the magnitude of spinal deformities [4]. The reader must decide which vertebrae are the ends of the curvature or terminal vertebrae. Lines are drawn along the endplates, and the angle between the two lines, where they intersect, measured. Most PACS will have a dedicated angle tool to measure this without needing the lines to intersect or add the lines at right angles. The Cobb angles can help measure or monitor progression and can aid in treatment decisions (Fig 6).
cobb angle measurement illustration

Image 6. Measuring the Cobb angle (adopted from [4])

Adjacent soft tissue, including the crura of the diaphragm (seen adjacent to the upper lumbar spine) and the bulges of the psoas and quadratus lumborum muscles seen lower down, should also be assessed. The kidneys, gallbladder, female genital tract, aorta, and other structures may contain calcification, and nephrocalcinosis (and renal stones), gallstones, a calcified uterine fibroid, and a calcified aorta may be diagnosed as ‘incidental findings’ [1].

The Lateral View

The lateral view is best for showing loss of disc space, degenerative changes or subluxation. One should first check for alignment of the vertebral bodies (Fig 7). Each vertebral body, disc spaces, posterior elements and transverse processes (Fi. 8). Disc spaces should gradually increase height from superior to inferior in the lumbar spine with the exception for the L5-S1 space sometimes being less than L4-5. The pedicles gradually become wider from superior to inferior. Each exam should look closely for signs of compression fractures such as loss of disc height. These fractures are more likely in the lower thoracic or upper lumbar vertebrae and can be acute or chronic [5]. The marginal or posterior vertebral line should be evaluated, looking for the subluxation or spondylolisthesis. Adjacent soft tissue should be assessed. As mentioned previously, a calcified aorta is commonly seen on the lateral view.
lateral alignment of back labeled and unlabeled

Image 7. Lateral xray alignment

normal xray lumbar spine with and without labels

Image 8. Labeled lateral xray

The Oblique View

The oblique view is useful for finding a pars fracture or defect. The defect of the pars interarticularis is commonly known as the Scottie Dog sign. Each vertebrae should be evaluated for the Scottie dog and a crack through the neck is a fractured pars interarticularis (Fig. 9). The Scottie Dog’s leg and ear are the superior and inferior articulating processes respectively. In patients with facet joint degeneration, changes will be seen in the Scottie Dog’s ear and leg. If Scottie Dog’s neck is missing, the patient may have a traumatic injury to the pars interarticularis, a congenital defect or both [6].
Spondylolysis lumbar spine

Image 9. Spondylosis with fracture of neck of “Scottie Dog” (adopted from [6])

Flexion/Extension Views

The flexion and extension views may be used if the provider suspects instability of the time or sees spondylolisthesis on lateral x-rays, which is defined as anterior displacement of one vertebrae upon another (Fig. 10). In an unstable, mobile, spondylolisthesis, the displacement will be greater in flexion, and less in extension. In other words, the displacement may reduce in extension (Fig. 11, 12). In any case, a mobile spondylolisthesis can cause severe mechanical back pain, with leg pain if a nerve is pinched in the intervertebral foramen. Spondylolisthesis may affect up to 10 percent of the population and measurements are made to aid in treatment [6].
spondylolisthesis of lumbar spine xray and CT

Image 10. Spondylolisthesis of L5 (adopted [6])

flexion extension views illustration

Image 11. Flexion Extension views

Sponylolisthesis xray and MRI back pain

Figure 12. Flexion and extension views with measurements on xray and MRI (adopted from [11])

Other pathology

Wedge Fracture

Wedge fractures are usually stable injuries caused by excessive flexion, which results in a collapse of the anterior vertebral body (Fig. 13). On the lateral view, there is decreased height of the anterior wall of the vertebral body with the posterior wall intact and the spinal canal is not involved. If there is marked compression (greater than 40 percent) of the anterior two-thirds of the vertebral body or if the fracture extends across the entire vertebrae, the examiner may need to do flexion or extension views or suspect an unstable fracture [7]. Flexion and extension views would show an increase in the interspinous space (between two adjacent spinous processes).
wedge fracture xray back pain

Figure 13. Wedge fracture (adopted from [7])

Chance Fracture

While compression fractures are generally viewed as stable, there are other fractures of the lumbar spine that are viewed as unstable injuries. Chance fractures, also known as lap seatbelt fractures, usually occur at L2 or L3. These are usually seen on AP or lateral views (Fig. 14). Horizontal splitting or vertebrae and rupture of ligaments which may include the interspinous ligament, posterior longitudinal ligament, ligamentum flavum, facet joint capsule, and intervertebral disc. They are associated with intra-abdominal injury in up to 50 percent of cases [8,9]
xray and illustration of chance fracture

Figure 14. Chance fracture (adopted from [18])

Burst Fracture

Burst fractures caused from falls in which the heels of buttocks strike the ground first and may cause damage to the upper lumbar vertebrae, though burst fractures as low as L5 have been reported. Burst fractures result in collapse of the entire vertebral body and this is seen best on lateral x-rays (Fig. 15). On the AP view, the interpedicular distance is increased. Signs of unstable burst fractures include acute neurologic impairment, kyphosis greater than 20 degrees, acute subluxation and greater than 50 percent or greater encroachment on the spinal canal [1,10]. If a burst fracture is identified, further imaging (CT scan or MRI) is commonly ordered.
xray lumbar spine burst fracture

Figure 15. Burst fracture of L2 (Adopted from [12])

In conclusion, many orthopedic or sports medicine practices will experience patients with back pain. Lumbar radiographs are commonly ordered for both acute and chronic back pain and AP and lateral films are a mainstay for most conditions. Oblique views can help find spondylolysis and flexion and extension views can help quantify spondylolisthesis. Providers should also be aware of characteristics of both stable and unstable fractures.

Read More: http://wikism.org/Back_Pain_(Main)

REFERENCES

1. Van Gelderen, Fred. Understanding X-rays. Berlin: Springer, 2004.
2. Lee, Soo-Eon, et al. “Clinical experience of the dynamic stabilization system for the degenerative spine disease.” Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 43.5 (2008): 221.
3. Rastogi, Rajul, et al. “Winking-owl Sign-An Uncommon Presentation of Spine Metastasis.” International Journal of Clinical & Medical Images 3.5 (2016).
4. Gstoettner, Michaela, et al. “Inter-and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.” European Spine Journal 16.10 (2007): 1587-1592.
5. Alexandru, Daniela, and William So. “Evaluation and management of vertebral compression fractures.” The Permanente Journal 16.4 (2012): 46.
6. Mushtaq, Raza, Jack Porrino, and Gloria J. Guzmán Pérez-Carrillo. “Imaging of spondylolysis: the evolving role of magnetic resonance imaging.” The Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation 10 (2018): 675-680.
7. Magerl, F., et al. “A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries.” European Spine Journal 3.4 (1994): 184-201.
8. Koay J, Davis DD, Hogg JP. Chance Fractures. [Updated 2020 Aug 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536926/
9. Bernstein, Mark P., Stuart E. Mirvis, and K. Shanmuganathan. “Chance-type fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: imaging analysis in 53 patients.” American Journal of Roentgenology 187.4 (2006): 859-868.
10. Gilchrist, Nigel, et al. “Osteoporotic vertebral fracture prevalence varies widely.” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 33.8 (2018): 1546-1546.
11. Liu, Ning, et al. “Utility of flexion-extension radiographs in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective study.” Spine 40.16 (2015): E929-E935.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *